|
Dixfield Citizen News Home Site Map Newspapers Genealogy Surnames E-mail |
Communications, Etc. OUR BOSTON LETTER.
Vol. I. The Dixfield Citizen Thursday Evening, Sept 1, 1887 Single copy Three cents No. 20
|
Boston, August 24, 1887.
Our editor suggests that theological themes have been sufficiently
aired for the present. Thus to save from the waste basket some very
carefully prepared word, along that line as had suggested, I withhold
them until a more promising time. Readers may congratulate themselves
upon what they have escaped, and thank the editor for discriminating
in their favor. I had taken off my coat for "the greatest effort
of my life," but I will don it again and notify the ice man we
have sufficient of his commodity for the season.
Our yachting season is at its height. Boston is ahead of herself; her
Volunteer leading both her Puritan and Mayflower, the latter not
holding her own. Some say this is to be accounted for on the grounds
of the Mayflower having transferred her allegiance to New York. The
Scotchman has(?) arrived with his Thistle and now it is said the
VoIunteer is to be renamed Donkey. I foolishly inquired why. The reply
was "because a Donkey is the only thing that can get away with a
thistle." That's very well, but what's the matter with hardtack,
bee-hives, and the Rebellion, I replied. An average of six columns an
issue of the Boston and New York papers is devoted to yachting
matters. People must have something to talk about and no doubt there
is much to edify in the subject as presented in these many columns.
I suppose the good people of Eastern Oxford are deeply interested in
railroad extension, more especially the 1,000 voters along the line
and terminus of the proposed extension. I shall soon expect to hear of
weekly railroad meetings in the town: of Peru, Dixfield, Mexico and
Rumford - and why not Byron, Roxbury and Carthage? - to agitate and
discuss the question. Franchise League would be an appropriate name
for such meetings, the object of which, the extension of the railroad
will be quite in keeping with its name. There is every reasonable
argument for this extension, and only lame, one legged hobbies that
can be offered in opposition. A free right of way should be granted by
these towns. The towns through which the road is to pass ahould
immediately petition, if necessary, for power to make such a grant.
Personal damages will have to be met, which a committee of the League
could soon ascertain and provide for. I find the value of real estate
in these towns is nearly $1,500,000. Three-tenths of one per cent of
this at most will meet all land damages, which would be much more than
made up in an immediate increase in valuation. There are facts here
too patent for discussion. Courtesy on the part of the good citizens
of this community would seem to demand that they should afford a free
right of way to an in-stitution which comes to them, affording such
store of enrichment. It would be a mark of approval that would greatly
encourage those who are bearing the burden of venture, in that of time
and money, in this enterprise. Sentiment is as essential as means for
the real success of any enterprise; and it is the good, people who
skirt this proposed line that must supply the sentiments. A person
with means, seeking a field for investment, and having his attention
called to this enterprise and learning that a free right of way could
not be obtained. would naturally conclude that the enterprise
would be a failure, so far as the support and sympathy of the people
is concerned, which, is no small thing in this case. The men of this
stamp who built up the city of Lewiston were forced to abandon Rumford
Falls, as a natural source of power, because they got no encouragement
of this character from the more penurious than wise holders of
adjoining property. A person owning a loaf, which in order to get it
cut must give one-half of it, would be extremely foolish not to do so. I should judge from the tenor of an article in the TELEPHONE of the 18th inst. that there was an unfortunate apathy among the farmers of Eastern Oxford, but I trust this is technical rather than practical; and if I can judge from reports of the last fair and show, success was the result, which would seem to so affirm. I can't see as it matters who leads, when satisfactory results are obtained. Whoever shall lead must not expect to escape criticism, and the matter of criticism may as well be too little or too much horse trotting as any thing else.
|